morons.org
This is a text-only version of the site. Morons.org is designed to function best with browsers that can handle CSS2 at a minimum for font, color, background color and border attributes. Please consider upgrading your browser. We recommend Firefox.
False Authority Rant
HomeAdd to del.icio.usdigg thisEmail This PageTell a FriendHeadlinesForumLive ChatJournalsMenagerieAccountSite InformationFeedback

WWGDRantsWeird Old BooksHate Mail
Visit Our Friends:
Cost of War Ex-Gay Watch Fake Gay News Towleroad Evolve Fish Unknown News Smirking Chimp Stop Sterile Marriage Human Rights Campaign ACLU GLAAD Lambda Legal PFAW BugMeNot Google News

-= Featured Partners =-
Pagan Prattle: Loony fundie nonsense for the masses
YouHaveBO.com: The Internet's Premier Anonymous BO Notification Service
Boycott Kansas!: They may hate gays, but they'll not do it with our money.
Overheard in SF: Heard inbetween the rabbit squeezing and the carrot munching

Your chance to write for morons.org!

We want to add one new volunteer staff writer each week for the next six weeks. Think you have what it takes to write for morons.org? Find out all about our writer search now!

It never ceases to amaze me how something stupid can proliferate. Take, for example, the following quote, which you'll find in people's signatures everywhere:

"There are two major products that came from Berkeley: LSD and Unix. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
Even the quote itself is not consistant and is sometimes written:
"Two things came out of Berkeley: BSD and LSD. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."

The quote is usually attributed to "J.S. Anderson" or "Jeremy S. Anderson".

The problem here is that both quotes are incorrect. First, LSD did not come from Berkeley. LSD was developed in Sandoz labs in Basel, Switzerland. Second, BSD did come from Berkeley, but it is not "Unix". "Unix" was until recently a trademark of AT&T. I believe the Open Group is the most recent holder of the trademark. BSD is a UNIX flavour but is not Unix.

This is probably a case of false authority syndrome. Did anyone think to question this "J.S. Anderson" or his credentials? Does anyone know who he is now? Do people question the validity of his statement before putting it in their signature files? Who is J.S. Anderson anyway? If you search for the name "Jeremy S. Anderson" on the web, all you will find are quote pages containing the aforementioned misinformed quote. For all we know, Jeremy S. Anderson might not even be a real person.

Knowing all of this, then, what would possess people to put a false statement from someone they don't know at the bottom of all their email or usenet posts without questioning it at all?


-= Support our Partners =-
Want Your Link Here?


HTML generated using XSLT for type-5 browser (HTML 2.0; text-only; no tables; Lynx compatible)